https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43878 Vaginal suppositories containing chloramphenicol were treated as medicines for parenteral use for purposes of the exemption notification. The term "parenteral" was construed in its broader pharmacological sense, meaning administration by a route other than the alimentary canal, rather than being limited to injections alone. Because the product was administered through the vaginal route and bypassed the alimentary canal, it fell within the notification's scope. A narrow construction excluding locally applied medicines was rejected as inconsistent with the language and breadth of the exemption. en-us Tue, 22 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Jul 2014 12:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43878 Vaginal suppositories containing chloramphenicol were treated as medicines for parenteral use for purposes of the exemption notification. The term "parenteral" was construed in its broader pharmacological sense, meaning administration by a route other than the alimentary canal, rather than being limited to injections alone. Because the product was administered through the vaginal route and bypassed the alimentary canal, it fell within the notification's scope. A narrow construction excluding locally applied medicines was rejected as inconsistent with the language and breadth of the exemption. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43878