<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1656 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462105</link>
    <description>Tribunal rectified a clerical error in a Final Order by adding details of six omitted appeals to the chart. All 30 appeals, including DFIA license-related cases, were confirmed as heard and decided on merits. The rectification preserved the original substantive adjudication while ensuring accurate documentation of the appeals disposed of, without reopening the core legal determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 18:14:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1656 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462105</link>
      <description>Tribunal rectified a clerical error in a Final Order by adding details of six omitted appeals to the chart. All 30 appeals, including DFIA license-related cases, were confirmed as heard and decided on merits. The rectification preserved the original substantive adjudication while ensuring accurate documentation of the appeals disposed of, without reopening the core legal determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>