https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43863 The court found that the second respondent's failure to provide a personal hearing to the petitioners violated principles of natural justice, rendering the order invalid. Despite the availability of alternative remedies, the court allowed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India due to the significant procedural error. The impugned order was quashed, and the case was remitted for fresh disposal with an opportunity of hearing provided to the petitioners. en-us Thu, 22 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:35:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43863 The court found that the second respondent's failure to provide a personal hearing to the petitioners violated principles of natural justice, rendering the order invalid. Despite the availability of alternative remedies, the court allowed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India due to the significant procedural error. The impugned order was quashed, and the case was remitted for fresh disposal with an opportunity of hearing provided to the petitioners. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43863