<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cash Payment for Property Sale Under Rs. 7 Lakhs Upheld: Section 269SS Compliance Confirmed, Penalty Deleted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88669</link>
    <description>ITAT held that cash receipt of Rs. 7 lakhs for immovable property sale did not violate section 269SS. The unregistered agreement to sale, which subsequently culminated in a sale deed, was deemed valid. The department failed to verify the cash payment details or provide cogent reasons for rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim. No substantive evidence demonstrated a violation of statutory provisions. The tribunal found no merit in the penalty order and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty. The appeal was allowed, with the CIT(A)&#039;s procedural inconsistencies regarding appeal filing date also noted and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 08:46:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 08:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cash Payment for Property Sale Under Rs. 7 Lakhs Upheld: Section 269SS Compliance Confirmed, Penalty Deleted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88669</link>
      <description>ITAT held that cash receipt of Rs. 7 lakhs for immovable property sale did not violate section 269SS. The unregistered agreement to sale, which subsequently culminated in a sale deed, was deemed valid. The department failed to verify the cash payment details or provide cogent reasons for rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim. No substantive evidence demonstrated a violation of statutory provisions. The tribunal found no merit in the penalty order and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty. The appeal was allowed, with the CIT(A)&#039;s procedural inconsistencies regarding appeal filing date also noted and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 08:46:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>