<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1522 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771250</link>
    <description>HC ruled that a dealer with sales exempt under Section 7(c) of the Commercial Tax Act cannot claim input tax credit under Section 13. The court applied the Apex Court&#039;s precedent in Neha Enterprises, finding the statutory prohibition in Section 13(7) mandatory. The exemption from tax precludes input tax credit, regardless of policy considerations, and the impugned order was quashed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 08:46:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1522 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771250</link>
      <description>HC ruled that a dealer with sales exempt under Section 7(c) of the Commercial Tax Act cannot claim input tax credit under Section 13. The court applied the Apex Court&#039;s precedent in Neha Enterprises, finding the statutory prohibition in Section 13(7) mandatory. The exemption from tax precludes input tax credit, regardless of policy considerations, and the impugned order was quashed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>