<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1528 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771256</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal and set aside the demand for CENVAT duty on edible lactose. The appellant had imported edible lactose, processed part of it into pharma grade through job work, and cleared the remainder after reversing CENVAT credit. The Tribunal held that excise duty under Section 3 applies only to manufactured or produced goods, not merely cleared imported goods. Since the appellant had no manufacturing facility for edible lactose and only cleared imported inputs, no duty liability arose. The Commissioner failed to establish through evidence that the appellant manufactured edible grade lactose, making the demand unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 13:07:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1528 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771256</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal and set aside the demand for CENVAT duty on edible lactose. The appellant had imported edible lactose, processed part of it into pharma grade through job work, and cleared the remainder after reversing CENVAT credit. The Tribunal held that excise duty under Section 3 applies only to manufactured or produced goods, not merely cleared imported goods. Since the appellant had no manufacturing facility for edible lactose and only cleared imported inputs, no duty liability arose. The Commissioner failed to establish through evidence that the appellant manufactured edible grade lactose, making the demand unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>