<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1541 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771269</link>
    <description>Compensation, including solatium, received for compulsory acquisition of land under the National Highways Act was treated as exempt from income tax because section 96 of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 and CBDT Circular No. 36/2016 were held applicable on the facts. The award was made on 07.11.2014, but payment was actually received on 18.05.2015, and the matter was treated as covered by an earlier coordinate bench decision on identical facts. The resulting tax addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 08:46:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1541 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771269</link>
      <description>Compensation, including solatium, received for compulsory acquisition of land under the National Highways Act was treated as exempt from income tax because section 96 of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 and CBDT Circular No. 36/2016 were held applicable on the facts. The award was made on 07.11.2014, but payment was actually received on 18.05.2015, and the matter was treated as covered by an earlier coordinate bench decision on identical facts. The resulting tax addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>