<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43856</link>
    <description>Workers employed by a contractor operating inside the manufacturer&#039;s factory premises were treated as working within the precincts of that factory for Notification No. 88 of 1977-C.E. Because the contractor used the manufacturer&#039;s machines and electricity and the premises remained under the manufacturer&#039;s possession, those workers had to be included in the worker count. The inclusion pushed the total beyond the 49-worker limit, so the exemption was not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43856</link>
      <description>Workers employed by a contractor operating inside the manufacturer&#039;s factory premises were treated as working within the precincts of that factory for Notification No. 88 of 1977-C.E. Because the contractor used the manufacturer&#039;s machines and electricity and the premises remained under the manufacturer&#039;s possession, those workers had to be included in the worker count. The inclusion pushed the total beyond the 49-worker limit, so the exemption was not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>