https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771332 Calcutta HC disposed of a writ petition challenging goods detention under Section 129(1)(a) of WBGST CGST Act, 2017. Petitioners failed to establish ownership over seized goods, but court found they were denied fair hearing opportunity. HC directed that if petitioners file appeal within 4 weeks from Section 129(3) order, appellate authority must decide within 16 weeks, allowing petitioners to establish ownership and cross-examine witness whose statement was relied upon for detention. en-us Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jun 2025 11:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771332 Calcutta HC disposed of a writ petition challenging goods detention under Section 129(1)(a) of WBGST CGST Act, 2017. Petitioners failed to establish ownership over seized goods, but court found they were denied fair hearing opportunity. HC directed that if petitioners file appeal within 4 weeks from Section 129(3) order, appellate authority must decide within 16 weeks, allowing petitioners to establish ownership and cross-examine witness whose statement was relied upon for detention. Case-Laws GST Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771332