https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771342 A challenge was raised to a letter requiring pre-deposit payment through the Electronic Cash Ledger, on the basis that compliance with section 107(6)(b) of the CGST Act could be made through the Electronic Credit Ledger and that the direction was arbitrary and contrary to Article 14. The record also noted that Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules had been deleted in 2024. The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the High Court's order and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. en-us Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jun 2026 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771342 A challenge was raised to a letter requiring pre-deposit payment through the Electronic Cash Ledger, on the basis that compliance with section 107(6)(b) of the CGST Act could be made through the Electronic Credit Ledger and that the direction was arbitrary and contrary to Article 14. The record also noted that Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules had been deleted in 2024. The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the High Court's order and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. Case-Laws GST Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771342