https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43849 The Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 were read to provide adequate chances for a temporary licence holder to qualify for a regular licence, including examination opportunities within the prescribed period. The challenge that the scheme gave insufficient chances failed because the scheme allowed a conjoint process of written and oral testing, and failure at the written stage did not expand entitlement to further oral attempts. The prescription of a substantial oral test with 50 per cent passing marks was upheld as a valid means of assessing specialised knowledge, probity, experience, temperament and judgment, and was not treated as arbitrary or violative of Article 14. The refusal of a regular licence was therefore sustained. en-us Wed, 14 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43849 The Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 were read to provide adequate chances for a temporary licence holder to qualify for a regular licence, including examination opportunities within the prescribed period. The challenge that the scheme gave insufficient chances failed because the scheme allowed a conjoint process of written and oral testing, and failure at the written stage did not expand entitlement to further oral attempts. The prescription of a substantial oral test with 50 per cent passing marks was upheld as a valid means of assessing specialised knowledge, probity, experience, temperament and judgment, and was not treated as arbitrary or violative of Article 14. The refusal of a regular licence was therefore sustained. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43849