<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 115 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43839</link>
    <description>The Madras HC held that promissory estoppel may operate against subordinate or delegated legislation and against governmental notifications issued under statutory power, where a party has altered its position on the faith of an earlier export policy. Applying that principle, the Court found the new restriction on export of red-sanders wood products, as applied to goods already manufactured and export-ready, lacked a real nexus with the stated ecological object and was arbitrary in the facts. The petitioner had acted on the earlier policy, entered contracts, arranged finance, and processed the goods for export, so the impugned communication could not be sustained. Relief was granted by directing issuance of the export licence against the letter of credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:57:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 115 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43839</link>
      <description>The Madras HC held that promissory estoppel may operate against subordinate or delegated legislation and against governmental notifications issued under statutory power, where a party has altered its position on the faith of an earlier export policy. Applying that principle, the Court found the new restriction on export of red-sanders wood products, as applied to goods already manufactured and export-ready, lacked a real nexus with the stated ecological object and was arbitrary in the facts. The petitioner had acted on the earlier policy, entered contracts, arranged finance, and processed the goods for export, so the impugned communication could not be sustained. Relief was granted by directing issuance of the export licence against the letter of credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>