<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43837</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitions, ruling that exemption notifications under Section 25 of the Customs Act do not automatically apply to the additional duty under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act. The petitioner must establish eligibility for excise duty exemption to claim relief from additional duty. No costs were awarded, and the petitioner was advised to seek clarification on any potential excise duty exemptions for the imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:50:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43837</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitions, ruling that exemption notifications under Section 25 of the Customs Act do not automatically apply to the additional duty under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act. The petitioner must establish eligibility for excise duty exemption to claim relief from additional duty. No costs were awarded, and the petitioner was advised to seek clarification on any potential excise duty exemptions for the imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>