<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 67 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43834</link>
    <description>Agglomerated marble slabs and tiles were not regarded as a new and distinct manufactured commodity because crushing marble chips, adding pigments and binders, moulding, and applying pressure did not alter their essential identity in trade and commercial understanding. Excise duty under Section 3 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 applies only where manufacture brings into existence a product with a distinct name, character and use, and that test was not satisfied here. The goods retained their essential character as marble products, so the specific tariff entry for Chapter 25 prevailed over the residuary Chapter 68. No excise duty was therefore leviable on the product.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:38:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 67 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43834</link>
      <description>Agglomerated marble slabs and tiles were not regarded as a new and distinct manufactured commodity because crushing marble chips, adding pigments and binders, moulding, and applying pressure did not alter their essential identity in trade and commercial understanding. Excise duty under Section 3 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 applies only where manufacture brings into existence a product with a distinct name, character and use, and that test was not satisfied here. The goods retained their essential character as marble products, so the specific tariff entry for Chapter 25 prevailed over the residuary Chapter 68. No excise duty was therefore leviable on the product.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>