https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771172 A charge sheet in a vigilance-angle matter was quashed because the Bank had treated the case as requiring the Central Vigilance Commission's first-stage advice before issuance, yet served the charge sheet before that advice was received and considered. The Court held that the Bank could not depart from its own stated position, and the delay, proximity to superannuation, and absence of proof of receipt of the advice justified interference with the disciplinary action. The disciplinary proceedings were set aside, and the employee was granted retiral benefits, but not back wages or allowances. en-us Tue, 20 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Aug 2025 18:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771172 A charge sheet in a vigilance-angle matter was quashed because the Bank had treated the case as requiring the Central Vigilance Commission's first-stage advice before issuance, yet served the charge sheet before that advice was received and considered. The Court held that the Bank could not depart from its own stated position, and the delay, proximity to superannuation, and absence of proof of receipt of the advice justified interference with the disciplinary action. The disciplinary proceedings were set aside, and the employee was granted retiral benefits, but not back wages or allowances. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771172