<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1467 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771195</link>
    <description>DRI officers&#039; jurisdictional challenge resolved by SC in Canon-II case. HC restored appeals to CESTAT for re-adjudication, overturning previous orders that invalidated show cause notices. SC definitively ruled DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of Customs Act, mandating fresh hearings on merits for pending cases challenging jurisdictional validity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 08:21:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1467 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771195</link>
      <description>DRI officers&#039; jurisdictional challenge resolved by SC in Canon-II case. HC restored appeals to CESTAT for re-adjudication, overturning previous orders that invalidated show cause notices. SC definitively ruled DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of Customs Act, mandating fresh hearings on merits for pending cases challenging jurisdictional validity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>