<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1471 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771199</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld exemption u/s 11 for training and development receipts, ruling that structured training programs with curriculum, attendance records, examinations, and certifications constitute educational activities within the broad scope of &#039;education&#039; under s. 2(15). The tribunal found training activities integral to the society&#039;s academic objectives under the AMITY University Uttar Pradesh Act, 2005, not separate commercial activities requiring compliance with s. 11(4A). Revenue&#039;s contention that training fees constituted business activity was rejected, with the tribunal distinguishing between the broader concept of &#039;education&#039; in s. 2(15) versus formal educational institutions under s. 10(23C). TDS deduction by fee payers was deemed non-determinative of receipt character.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 08:21:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1471 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771199</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld exemption u/s 11 for training and development receipts, ruling that structured training programs with curriculum, attendance records, examinations, and certifications constitute educational activities within the broad scope of &#039;education&#039; under s. 2(15). The tribunal found training activities integral to the society&#039;s academic objectives under the AMITY University Uttar Pradesh Act, 2005, not separate commercial activities requiring compliance with s. 11(4A). Revenue&#039;s contention that training fees constituted business activity was rejected, with the tribunal distinguishing between the broader concept of &#039;education&#039; in s. 2(15) versus formal educational institutions under s. 10(23C). TDS deduction by fee payers was deemed non-determinative of receipt character.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>