<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1508 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771236</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition regarding penalty imposition for e-way bill validity issues, finding an efficacious alternative remedy available through appeal. The petitioner claimed technical portal glitches prevented proper e-way bill extension before expiry on 20th February, 2025, despite attempting timely extension. The court held that since the appellate authority was competent to consider all questions raised by the petitioner, including portal technical issues, the writ petition was not maintainable. The petition was dismissed without costs, with direction that the appellate authority should consider the case on merits if an appeal is filed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1508 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771236</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition regarding penalty imposition for e-way bill validity issues, finding an efficacious alternative remedy available through appeal. The petitioner claimed technical portal glitches prevented proper e-way bill extension before expiry on 20th February, 2025, despite attempting timely extension. The court held that since the appellate authority was competent to consider all questions raised by the petitioner, including portal technical issues, the writ petition was not maintainable. The petition was dismissed without costs, with direction that the appellate authority should consider the case on merits if an appeal is filed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>