<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1516 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771244</link>
    <description>The HC ruled that GST proceedings under Section 130 are not maintainable for excess stock found during a survey. The court held that Sections 73/74 are the appropriate legal mechanism for addressing unaccounted goods. The petitioner lacked jurisdiction to initiate Section 130 proceedings, and the appellate order exempting tax, penalty, and fine on mentha oil was legally sound and upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 18:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1516 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771244</link>
      <description>The HC ruled that GST proceedings under Section 130 are not maintainable for excess stock found during a survey. The court held that Sections 73/74 are the appropriate legal mechanism for addressing unaccounted goods. The petitioner lacked jurisdiction to initiate Section 130 proceedings, and the appellate order exempting tax, penalty, and fine on mentha oil was legally sound and upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>