https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=44381 The core legal issue is whether removals to third countries complied with the court's procedural requirement that individuals receive notice of the destination in a language they understand and a meaningful opportunity to object that return to a non-homeland country would put them in danger. The government argued prior proceedings and in custody interviews suffice and cited operational security; advocates asserted denial of notice, counsel and interpreters, and requested return or supervised interviews abroad. The judge indicated remedies and potential contempt for noncompliance. en-us Thu, 22 May 2025 04:46:02 +0530 Thu, 22 May 2025 04:46:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=44381 The core legal issue is whether removals to third countries complied with the court's procedural requirement that individuals receive notice of the destination in a language they understand and a meaningful opportunity to object that return to a non-homeland country would put them in danger. The government argued prior proceedings and in custody interviews suffice and cited operational security; advocates asserted denial of notice, counsel and interpreters, and requested return or supervised interviews abroad. The judge indicated remedies and potential contempt for noncompliance. News - Thu, 22 May 2025 04:46:02 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=44381