<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1658 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462093</link>
    <description>The SC affirmed the HC&#039;s ruling that the refund application for unutilised CENVAT credit of abolished cesses was time-barred and not maintainable. The Court held that the statutory provisions did not permit transitioning or refunding such credits into the GST regime. The appellant&#039;s claims under Sections 142(3) and 55 of the CGST Act were rejected, finding no legal basis for the requested relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 21:35:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1658 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462093</link>
      <description>The SC affirmed the HC&#039;s ruling that the refund application for unutilised CENVAT credit of abolished cesses was time-barred and not maintainable. The Court held that the statutory provisions did not permit transitioning or refunding such credits into the GST regime. The appellant&#039;s claims under Sections 142(3) and 55 of the CGST Act were rejected, finding no legal basis for the requested relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>