<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43808</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld Chandigarh&#039;s jurisdiction to try the case involving evasion of Central Excise tax. It affirmed the Assistant Collector&#039;s authority to file a complaint and request record production. Criticizing the Chief Judicial Magistrate for inadequately applying their mind, the Court quashed the summoning order. The Court directed the trial Court to reevaluate the case with proper consideration before issuing a new summoning order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:19:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43808</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld Chandigarh&#039;s jurisdiction to try the case involving evasion of Central Excise tax. It affirmed the Assistant Collector&#039;s authority to file a complaint and request record production. Criticizing the Chief Judicial Magistrate for inadequately applying their mind, the Court quashed the summoning order. The Court directed the trial Court to reevaluate the case with proper consideration before issuing a new summoning order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>