https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43803 Observations on frustration of export contracts did not conclusively determine the separate question whether the appellant could claim indemnity against Indian suppliers if foreign buyers later asserted claims. Because that indemnity issue was neither specifically raised nor adjudicated, it could not operate as a binding bar in future proceedings. The Court left the matter open to be decided on the facts of any actual claim, and the appellant remained free to raise its contractual indemnity right if the contingency arose. en-us Fri, 15 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jul 2014 15:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43803 Observations on frustration of export contracts did not conclusively determine the separate question whether the appellant could claim indemnity against Indian suppliers if foreign buyers later asserted claims. Because that indemnity issue was neither specifically raised nor adjudicated, it could not operate as a binding bar in future proceedings. The Court left the matter open to be decided on the facts of any actual claim, and the appellant remained free to raise its contractual indemnity right if the contingency arose. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43803