<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1441 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462079</link>
    <description>ITAT Raipur upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision treating unsecured loans from three parties as unexplained cash credits under section 68. The assessee failed to prove identity and creditworthiness of lenders and genuineness of transactions. The tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)&#039;s well-reasoned order confirming the addition as unexplained cash credits, deciding against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 13:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1441 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462079</link>
      <description>ITAT Raipur upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision treating unsecured loans from three parties as unexplained cash credits under section 68. The assessee failed to prove identity and creditworthiness of lenders and genuineness of transactions. The tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)&#039;s well-reasoned order confirming the addition as unexplained cash credits, deciding against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>