<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 104 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43792</link>
    <description>Ultramarine Blue in small retail packs was analysed for tariff classification under competing excise headings, with the text explaining that packing size does not alter the product&#039;s intrinsic character. The discussion treats Heading 32.12 as covering pigments and colouring matter in the nature of dyes for domestic or laboratory use, while Ultramarine Blue is described as not being a pigment and therefore outside that entry. It also states that an earlier approved classification cannot be reopened on a mere change of opinion where there is no change in facts, law, or tariff position, and that an administrative circular cannot override the legal classification already settled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:05:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 104 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43792</link>
      <description>Ultramarine Blue in small retail packs was analysed for tariff classification under competing excise headings, with the text explaining that packing size does not alter the product&#039;s intrinsic character. The discussion treats Heading 32.12 as covering pigments and colouring matter in the nature of dyes for domestic or laboratory use, while Ultramarine Blue is described as not being a pigment and therefore outside that entry. It also states that an earlier approved classification cannot be reopened on a mere change of opinion where there is no change in facts, law, or tariff position, and that an administrative circular cannot override the legal classification already settled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>