<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer Pricing Appeal Succeeds: Internal Comparables Validated, Tax Adjustment of INR 30.2M Overturned Based on Profitability Analysis</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88581</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed taxpayer&#039;s appeal, rejecting transfer pricing adjustment of INR 30,264,835. The tribunal found merit in the argument that internal comparables should not be dismissed solely based on transaction volume. Referencing a prior Delhi HC decision, the tribunal held that comparable entities cannot be automatically rejected due to size disparity. The lower authorities erred in disqualifying the assessee&#039;s internal non-arm&#039;s length transaction profitability comparison. Consequently, the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) adjustment was deleted, affirming the taxpayer&#039;s transfer pricing methodology as justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:29:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer Pricing Appeal Succeeds: Internal Comparables Validated, Tax Adjustment of INR 30.2M Overturned Based on Profitability Analysis</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88581</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed taxpayer&#039;s appeal, rejecting transfer pricing adjustment of INR 30,264,835. The tribunal found merit in the argument that internal comparables should not be dismissed solely based on transaction volume. Referencing a prior Delhi HC decision, the tribunal held that comparable entities cannot be automatically rejected due to size disparity. The lower authorities erred in disqualifying the assessee&#039;s internal non-arm&#039;s length transaction profitability comparison. Consequently, the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) adjustment was deleted, affirming the taxpayer&#039;s transfer pricing methodology as justified.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:29:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>