<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1366 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771094</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chandigarh allowed appeals regarding CENVAT credit entitlement on FOR sale transactions. The appellant sold goods on FOR basis including freight value in assessable value, which department disputed. Tribunal followed precedents from Ramco Cements Limited case by CESTAT Chennai Larger Bench and HC Himachal Pradesh decision, holding that when FOR sales include freight charges in assessable value, assessee is entitled to CENVAT credit of service tax. The impugned order was set aside as unsustainable in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:29:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1366 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771094</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chandigarh allowed appeals regarding CENVAT credit entitlement on FOR sale transactions. The appellant sold goods on FOR basis including freight value in assessable value, which department disputed. Tribunal followed precedents from Ramco Cements Limited case by CESTAT Chennai Larger Bench and HC Himachal Pradesh decision, holding that when FOR sales include freight charges in assessable value, assessee is entitled to CENVAT credit of service tax. The impugned order was set aside as unsustainable in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>