<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1375 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771103</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi set aside the revocation of a customs broker&#039;s license and forfeiture order. The customs broker was accused of facilitating overvalued export clearances for non-existent exporters and violating CBLR 2018 regulations. The tribunal held that customs brokers have no power to examine goods or assess values under customs law, only to file shipping bills per provided documents. The broker had verified required KYC documents which were valid. No evidence proved the broker&#039;s prior knowledge of mis-declarations. The inquiry officer&#039;s report supported the broker, finding no violations of regulations 10(d), 10(e), and 10(n). The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:29:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1375 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771103</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi set aside the revocation of a customs broker&#039;s license and forfeiture order. The customs broker was accused of facilitating overvalued export clearances for non-existent exporters and violating CBLR 2018 regulations. The tribunal held that customs brokers have no power to examine goods or assess values under customs law, only to file shipping bills per provided documents. The broker had verified required KYC documents which were valid. No evidence proved the broker&#039;s prior knowledge of mis-declarations. The inquiry officer&#039;s report supported the broker, finding no violations of regulations 10(d), 10(e), and 10(n). The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>