<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1377 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771105</link>
    <description>SC upheld partial appeal in customs duty case. Redemption fine of Rs. 10,00,000 was maintained. Penalty under section 112(a) reduced to Rs. 5,00,000. Penalty under section 114AA was set aside due to non-retrospective application, as the Bill of Entry was filed before the section&#039;s enactment. Court balanced statutory interpretation with proportionality in penalty assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:29:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1377 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771105</link>
      <description>SC upheld partial appeal in customs duty case. Redemption fine of Rs. 10,00,000 was maintained. Penalty under section 112(a) reduced to Rs. 5,00,000. Penalty under section 114AA was set aside due to non-retrospective application, as the Bill of Entry was filed before the section&#039;s enactment. Court balanced statutory interpretation with proportionality in penalty assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>