<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43787</link>
    <description>Deductions from excisable value for turnover discount, cash discount, prompt payment discount, dealer discounts and transit insurance are allowable only when the assessee proves entitlement, quantum and linkage to the relevant goods at or before removal. Unsupported claims based on later credit notes, unproduced circulars, missing break-ups, or absent policy documents were rejected because the authority could not verify that the allowances were ascertainable in the valuation period. The assessment was therefore sustained, and the broader principle is that discounts or related charges in excise valuation must be evidenced and identifiable at the relevant stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:53:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43787</link>
      <description>Deductions from excisable value for turnover discount, cash discount, prompt payment discount, dealer discounts and transit insurance are allowable only when the assessee proves entitlement, quantum and linkage to the relevant goods at or before removal. Unsupported claims based on later credit notes, unproduced circulars, missing break-ups, or absent policy documents were rejected because the authority could not verify that the allowances were ascertainable in the valuation period. The assessment was therefore sustained, and the broader principle is that discounts or related charges in excise valuation must be evidenced and identifiable at the relevant stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>