<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1398 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771126</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee in a transfer pricing dispute, directing exclusion of seven comparables selected by the TPO. The excluded companies were MPS Ltd (significant R&amp;amp;D activities, no segmental data), IRIS Business Services Ltd (multiple service lines without segmental bifurcation), Omega Healthcare Management Services (100% related party transactions), ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd (RPT exceeding 25%, limited segmental data), eClerx Services Ltd (functionally distinct KPO operations), Infobeans Technologies Ltd (mixed revenue streams without segmental data), and Thirdware Solutions Ltd (high-end software development). After exclusions, remaining comparables&#039; margins aligned with assessee&#039;s declared margins, proving arm&#039;s length pricing. ITAT directed AO to recompute ALP and deleted additions under Section 92CA(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 15:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1398 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771126</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee in a transfer pricing dispute, directing exclusion of seven comparables selected by the TPO. The excluded companies were MPS Ltd (significant R&amp;amp;D activities, no segmental data), IRIS Business Services Ltd (multiple service lines without segmental bifurcation), Omega Healthcare Management Services (100% related party transactions), ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd (RPT exceeding 25%, limited segmental data), eClerx Services Ltd (functionally distinct KPO operations), Infobeans Technologies Ltd (mixed revenue streams without segmental data), and Thirdware Solutions Ltd (high-end software development). After exclusions, remaining comparables&#039; margins aligned with assessee&#039;s declared margins, proving arm&#039;s length pricing. ITAT directed AO to recompute ALP and deleted additions under Section 92CA(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>