<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 100 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43786</link>
    <description>An exemption notification must be construed strictly and as a whole, and its conditions must be satisfied cumulatively before exemption is available. The Bombay HC held that documentary films and advertisement shorts of 8 mm width did not qualify for full excise exemption under Notification No. 210/76 because the notification did not create an independent, unconditional class for films within the stated width. The court further held that punctuation and the explanatory second paragraph could not enlarge the scope of the substantive exemption beyond the express conditions imposed. The exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:49:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 100 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43786</link>
      <description>An exemption notification must be construed strictly and as a whole, and its conditions must be satisfied cumulatively before exemption is available. The Bombay HC held that documentary films and advertisement shorts of 8 mm width did not qualify for full excise exemption under Notification No. 210/76 because the notification did not create an independent, unconditional class for films within the stated width. The court further held that punctuation and the explanatory second paragraph could not enlarge the scope of the substantive exemption beyond the express conditions imposed. The exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>