<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1416 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771144</link>
    <description>SC found a violation of natural justice principles in tax assessment proceedings. The impugned order was set aside due to respondent&#039;s failure to appear in scheduled video conference and denial of hearing opportunities. The court directed a fresh hearing with 14 days&#039; notice, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be heard in administrative proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1416 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771144</link>
      <description>SC found a violation of natural justice principles in tax assessment proceedings. The impugned order was set aside due to respondent&#039;s failure to appear in scheduled video conference and denial of hearing opportunities. The court directed a fresh hearing with 14 days&#039; notice, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be heard in administrative proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>