<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1431 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771159</link>
    <description>HC ruled on a GST-related dispute, primarily focusing on procedural fairness. The Court disposed of the writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the original order. Interim orders restraining recovery and coercive actions were continued for six weeks, allowing the petitioner to challenge the GST notice through proper appellate channels while preserving the status quo of the financial dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1431 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771159</link>
      <description>HC ruled on a GST-related dispute, primarily focusing on procedural fairness. The Court disposed of the writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the original order. Interim orders restraining recovery and coercive actions were continued for six weeks, allowing the petitioner to challenge the GST notice through proper appellate channels while preserving the status quo of the financial dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>