<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1182 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed whether the Central Processing Centre (CPC) could disallow a deduction under section 80P for late return filing in AY 2018-19. Ruling in favor of the assessee, the Tribunal held that the 2021 amendment empowering CPC to deny deductions for late filing was prospective and not applicable retrospectively. The CPC&#039;s disallowance was deemed improper, and the deduction under section 80P was to be allowed for the assessment year in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 18:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=823056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1182 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed whether the Central Processing Centre (CPC) could disallow a deduction under section 80P for late return filing in AY 2018-19. Ruling in favor of the assessee, the Tribunal held that the 2021 amendment empowering CPC to deny deductions for late filing was prospective and not applicable retrospectively. The CPC&#039;s disallowance was deemed improper, and the deduction under section 80P was to be allowed for the assessment year in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>