https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43776 Judicial review under Article 226 ordinarily does not extend to a reasoned interlocutory pre-deposit order made by an appellate authority where financial hardship has been considered and no apparent error is shown. The Tribunal reduced the required deposit of duty and penalty after considering the petitioner's financial position. As the underlying appeal remained pending and the order was interim in nature, interference was unwarranted. The High Court therefore declined to disturb the reduced pre-deposit requirement. en-us Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:19:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43776 Judicial review under Article 226 ordinarily does not extend to a reasoned interlocutory pre-deposit order made by an appellate authority where financial hardship has been considered and no apparent error is shown. The Tribunal reduced the required deposit of duty and penalty after considering the petitioner's financial position. As the underlying appeal remained pending and the order was interim in nature, interference was unwarranted. The High Court therefore declined to disturb the reduced pre-deposit requirement. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43776