https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43776 Interference under Article 226 is ordinarily unwarranted against a reasoned interlocutory pre-deposit order of an appellate authority, especially where the authority has considered financial hardship and no apparent error is shown. The Tribunal had reduced the pre-deposit of duty and penalty from the original demand while the appeal remained pending, and the High Court declined to disturb that interim order. The note affirms that judicial review is not normally exercised to interfere with a purely interlocutory order on pre-deposit when the authority has applied its mind to the relevant circumstances. en-us Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:19:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43776 Interference under Article 226 is ordinarily unwarranted against a reasoned interlocutory pre-deposit order of an appellate authority, especially where the authority has considered financial hardship and no apparent error is shown. The Tribunal had reduced the pre-deposit of duty and penalty from the original demand while the appeal remained pending, and the High Court declined to disturb that interim order. The note affirms that judicial review is not normally exercised to interfere with a purely interlocutory order on pre-deposit when the authority has applied its mind to the relevant circumstances. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43776