<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43770</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal to reconsider the matter if approached by the petitioner with a certified copy of the High Court&#039;s order within two weeks. The tribunal was instructed to address the three points raised by the petitioner and issue a speaking order within four weeks, allowing the petitioner a fair opportunity to present their case. The High Court declined to quash the tribunal&#039;s order, emphasizing that equity between the parties would be maintained if the tribunal considered the mentioned grounds. The writ petition was disposed of, with the tribunal instructed to provide a decision after reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:00:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43770</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal to reconsider the matter if approached by the petitioner with a certified copy of the High Court&#039;s order within two weeks. The tribunal was instructed to address the three points raised by the petitioner and issue a speaking order within four weeks, allowing the petitioner a fair opportunity to present their case. The High Court declined to quash the tribunal&#039;s order, emphasizing that equity between the parties would be maintained if the tribunal considered the mentioned grounds. The writ petition was disposed of, with the tribunal instructed to provide a decision after reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>