<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1768 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462067</link>
    <description>Tax tribunal addressed contingent liability disallowance in income tax assessment. SC held that contingent liabilities mentioned only in accounting notes, without being debited to profit and loss account, cannot be added back to taxable income. AO&#039;s addition was unjustified as the liability was not actually recognized as an expense. CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition was upheld, emphasizing proper accounting treatment over technical audit report mentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 15:28:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1768 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462067</link>
      <description>Tax tribunal addressed contingent liability disallowance in income tax assessment. SC held that contingent liabilities mentioned only in accounting notes, without being debited to profit and loss account, cannot be added back to taxable income. AO&#039;s addition was unjustified as the liability was not actually recognized as an expense. CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition was upheld, emphasizing proper accounting treatment over technical audit report mentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>