https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43768 The Tribunal's reduced pre-deposit requirement was upheld because it was fixed after considering financial hardship and disclosed no error of law warranting interference under Article 226. Recovery was nevertheless stayed pending disposal of the statutory appeal, and the appeal was directed to be heard expeditiously on merits without insisting on the pre-deposit. en-us Fri, 01 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:56:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43768 The Tribunal's reduced pre-deposit requirement was upheld because it was fixed after considering financial hardship and disclosed no error of law warranting interference under Article 226. Recovery was nevertheless stayed pending disposal of the statutory appeal, and the appeal was directed to be heard expeditiously on merits without insisting on the pre-deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43768