https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43767 The court quashed the impugned orders and directed the third respondent to reconsider the revision under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, focusing on the merits of the case. A timeline of three months was set for the review, emphasizing the importance of exercising suo motu revision powers for ensuring justice. The petitioner's writ petition was allowed without costs, granting a fair opportunity for review. en-us Thu, 03 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:55:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43767 The court quashed the impugned orders and directed the third respondent to reconsider the revision under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, focusing on the merits of the case. A timeline of three months was set for the review, emphasizing the importance of exercising suo motu revision powers for ensuring justice. The petitioner's writ petition was allowed without costs, granting a fair opportunity for review. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43767