<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Provisional Bank Account Attachment Under Section 83 Quashed Due to Lack of Substantive Revenue Risk Evidence</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88555</link>
    <description>HC quashed the provisional attachment of petitioner&#039;s bank account under Section 83 of CGST Act, 2017. The court found the respondents&#039; action arbitrary, lacking substantive evidence of revenue risk. Despite petitioner&#039;s non-cooperation in show cause proceedings, the attachment was deemed invalid as the authorities failed to demonstrate a reasonable apprehension of revenue default. The court emphasized that provisional attachment requires cogent material basis and cannot be justified by mere procedural non-compliance. The impugned order was set aside, with directions to immediately de-freeze the petitioner&#039;s bank account, reinforcing the principle that administrative powers must be exercised with due diligence and proportionality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 08:53:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 08:53:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Provisional Bank Account Attachment Under Section 83 Quashed Due to Lack of Substantive Revenue Risk Evidence</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88555</link>
      <description>HC quashed the provisional attachment of petitioner&#039;s bank account under Section 83 of CGST Act, 2017. The court found the respondents&#039; action arbitrary, lacking substantive evidence of revenue risk. Despite petitioner&#039;s non-cooperation in show cause proceedings, the attachment was deemed invalid as the authorities failed to demonstrate a reasonable apprehension of revenue default. The court emphasized that provisional attachment requires cogent material basis and cannot be justified by mere procedural non-compliance. The impugned order was set aside, with directions to immediately de-freeze the petitioner&#039;s bank account, reinforcing the principle that administrative powers must be exercised with due diligence and proportionality.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 08:53:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>