<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1293 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771021</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC dismissed defendant&#039;s application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of plaint filed after 18 years. Plaintiff sought possession claiming breach of 1989 understanding when defendant executed sale deed in 2006, constituting first breach of faith. Court held limitation and Benami Transaction Act issues were triable matters requiring oral evidence, not suitable for summary disposal. Despite 18-year delay, plaintiff&#039;s claim of discovering breach only in 2006 created triable issue. Court emphasized drastic powers under Order VII Rule 11 should not be exercised when plaint discloses cause of action requiring trial determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 08:53:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1293 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771021</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC dismissed defendant&#039;s application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of plaint filed after 18 years. Plaintiff sought possession claiming breach of 1989 understanding when defendant executed sale deed in 2006, constituting first breach of faith. Court held limitation and Benami Transaction Act issues were triable matters requiring oral evidence, not suitable for summary disposal. Despite 18-year delay, plaintiff&#039;s claim of discovering breach only in 2006 created triable issue. Court emphasized drastic powers under Order VII Rule 11 should not be exercised when plaint discloses cause of action requiring trial determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>