<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43760</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the denial of justice due to delays in the proceedings and expressing skepticism about the mala fide issuance of the show-cause notice. An interim order directed the unconditional release of the consignment to the petitioner within a specified timeframe. The court allowed the department to proceed but mandated alignment of any future orders with the final outcome of the writ petition. Respondents were given deadlines to file affidavits, and the court stressed the importance of timely resolution without staying its order. Compliance with the court&#039;s directives was required from all parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:19:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43760</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the denial of justice due to delays in the proceedings and expressing skepticism about the mala fide issuance of the show-cause notice. An interim order directed the unconditional release of the consignment to the petitioner within a specified timeframe. The court allowed the department to proceed but mandated alignment of any future orders with the final outcome of the writ petition. Respondents were given deadlines to file affidavits, and the court stressed the importance of timely resolution without staying its order. Compliance with the court&#039;s directives was required from all parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>