https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43758 The writ petition was rejected by the court due to the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal, which was considered adequate and effective. The petitioner's request for interpretation of final products specified in a notification was deemed suitable for appeal before the Appellate Tribunal under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The court directed the appellant to file an appeal within 30 days against the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals)'s order, emphasizing that the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 was not necessary in this case. en-us Tue, 15 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:14:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43758 The writ petition was rejected by the court due to the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal, which was considered adequate and effective. The petitioner's request for interpretation of final products specified in a notification was deemed suitable for appeal before the Appellate Tribunal under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The court directed the appellant to file an appeal within 30 days against the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals)'s order, emphasizing that the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 was not necessary in this case. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43758