<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1335 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771063</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to remand the matter to the TPO for fresh consideration of the transfer pricing adjustment related to intra-group services. The court found that the TPO erred in rejecting the Assessee&#039;s transfer pricing study without properly examining the value of services received. Both CIT(A) and ITAT had concluded that the Assessee received intra-group services, necessitating determination of ALP. The TPO must reassess the case considering the Assessee&#039;s transfer pricing analysis and ensure compliance with conditions under Section 92C(3) before making any adjustment. The HC found no substantial question of law and affirmed the remand for reconsideration in line with statutory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1335 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771063</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to remand the matter to the TPO for fresh consideration of the transfer pricing adjustment related to intra-group services. The court found that the TPO erred in rejecting the Assessee&#039;s transfer pricing study without properly examining the value of services received. Both CIT(A) and ITAT had concluded that the Assessee received intra-group services, necessitating determination of ALP. The TPO must reassess the case considering the Assessee&#039;s transfer pricing analysis and ensure compliance with conditions under Section 92C(3) before making any adjustment. The HC found no substantial question of law and affirmed the remand for reconsideration in line with statutory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>