<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1345 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771073</link>
    <description>HC set aside an ex-parte tax demand order under CGST Act due to ineffective notice communication. The court found that the petitioner was not properly served notices, preventing response to tax proceedings. Remanded the matter back to tax authority, directing a fresh hearing with proper opportunity for the petitioner to submit replies and contest the tax demand. Recovery proceedings were also halted pending proper adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1345 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771073</link>
      <description>HC set aside an ex-parte tax demand order under CGST Act due to ineffective notice communication. The court found that the petitioner was not properly served notices, preventing response to tax proceedings. Remanded the matter back to tax authority, directing a fresh hearing with proper opportunity for the petitioner to submit replies and contest the tax demand. Recovery proceedings were also halted pending proper adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>