<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462061</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that while the assessee admitted to obtaining bogus purchase bills from accommodation entry providers, the tribunal found that cash generated from these transactions was utilized solely for legitimate business purposes including land acquisition and development. Despite the Revenue proving bogus purchases through search evidence, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee as no evidence was presented showing the funds were used for personal or illegal activities. The decision went against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 13:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462061</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that while the assessee admitted to obtaining bogus purchase bills from accommodation entry providers, the tribunal found that cash generated from these transactions was utilized solely for legitimate business purposes including land acquisition and development. Despite the Revenue proving bogus purchases through search evidence, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee as no evidence was presented showing the funds were used for personal or illegal activities. The decision went against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>