<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43750</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a small-scale unit seeking an OGL Import Entitlement Certificate for importing raw materials to manufacture X-ray tubes. The court held that the petitioner met the eligibility criteria for exemption from customs duty under Notification No. 84-ITC (PN)/90-93, rejecting the respondents&#039; misinterpretation of the requirements for Actual Users (Industrial). The court ordered the issuance of the Actual User Certificate to the petitioner without port charges, directed Customs Authorities to pay costs for delayed release of goods, and denied the respondents&#039; request for a stay of the order. All parties were instructed to comply with the court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:44:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43750</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a small-scale unit seeking an OGL Import Entitlement Certificate for importing raw materials to manufacture X-ray tubes. The court held that the petitioner met the eligibility criteria for exemption from customs duty under Notification No. 84-ITC (PN)/90-93, rejecting the respondents&#039; misinterpretation of the requirements for Actual Users (Industrial). The court ordered the issuance of the Actual User Certificate to the petitioner without port charges, directed Customs Authorities to pay costs for delayed release of goods, and denied the respondents&#039; request for a stay of the order. All parties were instructed to comply with the court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>