<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1277 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771005</link>
    <description>Orders obtained on the basis of fabricated SCNs were noted as the central issue, and the Court considered it expedient to have all such matters heard by the Roster Bench. Because similar cases were already pending before a co-ordinate Bench, the course adopted was intended to avoid conflicting orders and ensure consistency in handling the pending disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1277 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771005</link>
      <description>Orders obtained on the basis of fabricated SCNs were noted as the central issue, and the Court considered it expedient to have all such matters heard by the Roster Bench. Because similar cases were already pending before a co-ordinate Bench, the course adopted was intended to avoid conflicting orders and ensure consistency in handling the pending disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>