<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1250 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770978</link>
    <description>HC set aside the order denying condonation and directed that the one-day delay in filing the ITR for AY 2016-17 be treated as condoned under s.119(2)(b). The court found genuine hardship as the petitioner had commenced uploading the return and two vital documents, making income ascertainable, and held the taxing authority was obliged to exercise its discretionary power to relax conditions. The application under s.119(2)(b) was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=822647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1250 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770978</link>
      <description>HC set aside the order denying condonation and directed that the one-day delay in filing the ITR for AY 2016-17 be treated as condoned under s.119(2)(b). The court found genuine hardship as the petitioner had commenced uploading the return and two vital documents, making income ascertainable, and held the taxing authority was obliged to exercise its discretionary power to relax conditions. The application under s.119(2)(b) was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>